MAJORS v. MAJORS

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Contempt of court — Noncompliance with order to pay alimony — Evidence — Findings of fact by trial court — Sufficiency — Section 2315.22, Revised Code — Ability to pay — Necessity of finding as fact — Bill of exceptions — Sufficiency — Court of Appeals — Judgment of affirmance — Due process — Section 16, Article I, Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.