THE STATE OF OHIO v. CATO

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Assault with intent to rob — Shooting with intent to wound — Elements — Evidence — Intent — Confession — Admissibility — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Due process — Section 10, Article I, Constitution.

Per Curiam.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.