SALEM COOPERATIVE BANK v. SOUTHWICK

1. Where an adequate review of rulings of the Superior Court could be obtained by a bill of exceptions (RSA 490:10) a petition to the Supreme Court for certiorari to review such rulings was denied.

PER CURIAM.

It is established law that where an adequate remedy is available upon appeal, certiorari will not be granted. Waisman v. Manchester, 96 N.H. 50, 52; Nashua v. Public Utilities Commission, 101 N.H. 503. If the defendants have been aggrieved by the rulings of the Trial Court adequate review can be obtained by a bill of exceptions. RSA 490:10; Bagley v. Small, 92 N.H. 107, 108.