Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ARNOLD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Feb 2, 1960
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

Nos. 2466 and 2467.

Attorney(S)

Mark P. Friedlander, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Mark P. Friedlander

Blaine P. Friedlander, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for

Ted D. Kuemmerling,

Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Chester H. Gray,

Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal

Counsel,

Hubert B. Pair,

Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for

JUDGES

PER CURIAM.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of "colliding" and of "leaving after colliding" in violation of the Traffic and Motor Vehicle Regulations.

His contention on this appeal is that the court improperly limited his counsel in his cross-examination of the government's witnesses.

We have carefully examined the record and cannot say there was any abuse of discretion in this connection.

Affirmed.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x