Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

TERRETT v. COURT

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Mar 23, 1960
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Prohibition — Writ not available where other adequate remedy — Not substitute for appeal.

Per Curiam.

The petition fails to state operative facts which show that relator has no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. A writ of prohibition will ordinarily not be allowed where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and may not be a substitute for appeal.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained, and the writ of prohibition is denied.

Demurrer sustained and writ denied.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.