IN RE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Practice before United States Patent Office — Preparation and prosecution of patent applications for others in Ohio — Jurisdiction.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved. See Sperry v. State of Florida, ex rel. The Florida Bar, 373 U.S. 379.

Appeal dismissed.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH and HERBERT, JJ., concur.

GIBSON, J., not participating.