BAR ASSN. v. JURUS

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Soliciting clients — Disciplinary action — Indefinite suspension from practice — Acts warranting.

Per Curiam.

We overrule the objections of the respondent and approve the recommendation of the board that the respondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in this state, on the basis of Columbus Bar Assn. v. Agee (1964), 175 Ohio St. 443.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

HERBERT, J., concurs except as to the penalty, which should be a public reprimand.