SCHULTS v. BD. OF ED. OF TEANECK

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the Appellate Division's determination ( 86 N.J. Super. 29 (1964)) that the plaintiffs should first have exhausted their administrative remedies before the Commissioner and State Board of Education. The dismissal of their complaint is:

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.