THOMAS v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Carroll v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 172 So.2d 266; Taylor v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 171 So.2d 402; and Dozier v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 192 So.2d 506, opinion filed December 7, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

SHANNON, Acting C.J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.