ROSMAN v. CLARK

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 1966, reversed and motion granted, with $10 costs and disbursements. The method of service of process chosen by plaintiff is not authorized and is therefore invalid (CPLR 313, 311; Business Corporation Law, §§ 307, 306). It further appears that the facts, so far as they appear in this record, would not be sufficient basis for jurisdiction ( Kramer v. Vogl, 17 N.Y.2d 27; Feathers v. McLucas, 15 N.Y.2d 443, 458, 464). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.