- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
FROSTIFRESH CORP. v. REYNOSO
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.
May 24, 1967
Per Curiam.
While the evidence clearly warrants a finding that the contract was unconscionable (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-302), we are of the opinion that plaintiff should recover its net cost for the refrigerator-freezer, plus a reasonable profit, in addition to trucking and service charges necessarily incurred and reasonable finance charges.
The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered limited to an assessment of plaintiff's damages and entry of judgment thereon.
Concur — SCHWARTZWALD, FANELLI and BECKINELLA, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.