- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PETERSON v. PETERSON
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Oct 27, 1967
Contempt — constructive criminal contempt — procedure.
PER CURIAM.
Relator was convicted of contempt by the District Court of Hennepin County on March 19, 1965. The contempt was both constructive and criminal in nature. Because relator was not afforded a jury trial and the proceedings do not conform to the procedures required by our decision in Peterson v. Peterson, 278 Minn. 275, 153 N.W.2d 825, his conviction must be reversed and a new trial granted.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.