- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PETERSON v. PETERSON
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Oct 27, 1967
Contempt — constructive criminal contempt — procedures required in prosecution.
PER CURIAM.
Relator was convicted of constructive criminal contempt by the District Court of Hennepin County on March 18, 1965. The proceedings were prosecuted by plaintiff-respondent's private attorney rather than by the county attorney, and relator was not afforded a jury trial. The judgment accordingly must be reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with Peterson v. Peterson, 278 Minn. 275, 153 N.W.2d 825.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.