Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MAXWELL v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 19, 1967
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

DREW, Justice.

Petition for writ of certiorari has been granted to review the decision of the district court in this cause, Fla.App., 195 So.2d 255, as one which affects a class of state officers. The court affirmed an order striking affirmative defenses filed by the petitioner tax assessor in an action by the respondent hospital to compel tax exemption and cancellation of its assessment under F.S. Sec. 192.06(13), F.S.A.

Art. V, Sec. 4, Fla. Const., F.S.A.

"(13) All property, real and personal, of any hospital, licensed by the state board of health, owned and operated by a Florida corporation not for profit, which has been exempt from the payment of taxes to the United States upon the income derived from the operation of such hospital, and used by such hospital for hospital purposes, including but not limited to housing for nurses, interns and other hospital personnel, laboratories, laundries, parking lots, auditoriums, lecture halls, animal houses, pharmacies and other hospital uses; provided that all income of such hospital, remaining after payment of the usual and necessary expenses of operation, including the payment of liens and encumbrances upon its property, shall be used exclusively for educational, charitable or scientific purposes, including the maintenance, improvement or expansion of its facilities."

Upon pleadings detailed in the opinion above cited, the district court held that the defendant assessor could not plead the alleged discriminatory admission policies as a bar to tax exemption because, as tax assessor, he "has no authority to impose additional conditions or restrictions upon those shown to be entitled to the exemption as set forth in the statute." The court correctly concluded that defendant's plea did not controvert the validity of the statute, and that denial of the exemption for any reason other than noncompliance with the statute would be an exercise of power in excess of that granted such officer.

195 So.2d 255, 256.

We find no error in the decision and the writ is accordingly discharged.

CALDWELL, C.J., THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., and WHITE, Circuit Judge (Retired), concur.