Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SMITH v. NELSON

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan 3, 1968
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES

390 F.2d 643

DOCKET NO.

No. 22328.

ATTORNEY(S)

Jay B. Bunnin, Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Roy Eisenhardt, Harry J. Kreamer, Gary D. Berger, San Francisco, Cal., Paul N. Halvonik, Marshall W. Krause, San Francisco, Cal., American Civil Liberties Union, Richard Bancroft, San Francisco, Cal., Garfield Stewart, San Francisco, Cal., Chairman Legal Redress Committee N.A.A.C.P., Center City Branch, Jack Greenberg, Leyoy D. Clark, Michael Meltsner, Charles S. Ralston, Melvyn Zarr, New York City, N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense Educational Funds, Inc., Nathaniel Colley, Sacramento, Cal., Western Regional Counsel, N.A.A.C.P., for appellant. Leaman Russell Smith, pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for the appellee.

JUDGES

Charles Merton Merrill

Montgomery Oliver Koelsch

Benjamin Cushing Duniway

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
ORDER ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the Supreme Court of California, in two related cases, In re Anderson, Crim. 11572 and In re Saterfield, Crim. 11573, has granted a stay of all death penalties and is entertaining contentions which are here made by appellant;

It is hereby ordered that this matter be remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 275 F. Supp. 261, with directions to take no further action, pending the outcome of the proceeding in the related cases now pending in the Supreme Court of California.

To accommodate this remand, the order of the District Court here appealed from is vacated.

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x