Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

HILL v. THORNTON

Oregon Supreme Court.
Feb 28, 1968
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
Attorney(S)

William B. Wyllie, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Rhoten, Rhoten and Speerstra, Salem. Walter L. Barrie, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem. Green, Richardson, Griswold Murphy, Donald S. Richardson, Portland, DeArmond, Sherman Barber, and John A. Bryan, Salem, attorneys for Oregon AFLCIO, and Carney Haley, Richard R. Carney, Portland, attorneys for Joint Council of Teamsters, No. 47, filed a brief amicus curiae.

JUDGES

PER CURIAM.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, being dissatisfied with the ballot title prepared by the attorney general for an initiative measure filed with the Secretary of State, has appealed.

His argument on appeal is that the title as prepared violates the spirit of ORS 254.070.

We have carefully examined the ballot title prepared by the attorney general and are of the opinion that the title as prepared is in compliance with the statutes.

The attorney general's ballot title is affirmed.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x