HAYWOOD v. STATE

MANN, Judge.

Appellant contends that his petition under Rule 1.850, F.R.C.P., 33 F.S.A., was erroneously denied without an evidentiary hearing. The petition alleges improper reception of a guilty plea. The record indicates that the trial judge asked a long and appropriate series of questions the answers to which indicate clearly that the appellant knowingly and intelligently entered a plea of guilty.

Oral argument is dispensed with as serving no useful purpose pursuant to Rule 3.10, subd. e, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and PIERCE, J., concur.