Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

BILLINGS v. EAST RIVER SAVINGS BANK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Feb 2, 1970
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Order entered September 13, 1968, denying third-party defendant-appellant's motion to dismiss the third-party complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to the third-party defendant-appellant, and the motion granted, the action severed and the third-party complaint dismissed as to Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York. The depositor, the third-party plaintiff-respondent, having failed to give notice of the forged indorsements within three years from the date a statement of account accompanied by the checks was received from its bank, the third-party defendant-appellant, its claim against appellant is barred by both section 43 of the Negotiable Instruments Law and subdivision (4) of section 4-406 of the Uniform Commercial Code. These are not limitation statutes fixing the time within which action must be brought. They create a rule of substantive law, a statutory prerequisite of notice. A Statute of Limitations may be tolled; the bar of a condition precedent to liability may not be lifted. ( Shattuck v. Guardian Trust Co., 204 N.Y. 200, 209; Bloch v. Schwartz, 266 App. Div. 188, 190; Cohen v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 144 N.Y.S.2d 366, 370, Commander-Larabee Milling Co. v. Manufacturers Traders Trust Co., 61 F. Supp. 341; Wm. M. Barrett, Inc. v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 191 La. 945.)

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Eager, Markewich, Nunez and Tilzer, JJ.