- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
CONNERS v. UNITED STATES
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sep 25, 1970
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
PER CURIAM:
The District Court denied appellant relief under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 for the reason that appellant "has too long slept upon his rights." Section 2255, however, expressly provides that a motion for relief under that section may be made at any time.
"This later provision simply means that, as in habeas corpus, there is no statute of limitations, no res judicata, and that the doctrine of laches is inapplicable." Heflin v. United States, 358 U.S. 415, 420, 79 S.Ct. 451, 454, 3 L.Ed.2d 407 (concurring opinion 1959); Haier v. United States, 334 F.2d 441 (10th Cir. 1964).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.