Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ELLHAMER v. WILSON

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jul 7, 1971
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

Nos. 25919, 25953.

Attorney(S)

James B. Cuneo, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Evelle J. Younger, Cal. Atty. Gen., John T. Murphy, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellants. John H. Colteaux (argued), of Ackeret Colteaux, San Rafael, Cal., for appellee, William Ellhamer. Alice Daniel, William B. Turner, San Francisco, Cal., for amicus curiae. Emil Eisenhardt (argued), James L. Browning, U.S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Chief Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee, Charles Hinnington.

JUDGES

Richard Harvey Chambers

Montgomery Oliver Koelsch

James Arnold von der Heydt

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM:

The orders granting writs of habeas corpus to Ellhamer and Hinnington, California state prisoners, are reversed. The district court will enter orders denying the writs.

We are asked to overrule our cases which have upheld California in not providing counsel on parole revocation hearings. This we decline to do. See High Pine v. Montana, 9 Cir., 439 F.2d 1093; Lincoln v. California Adult Authority, 9 Cir., 435 F.2d 133; Mead v. California Adult Authority, 9 Cir., 415 F.2d 767.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x