- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. JUHL
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Feb 29, 1972
Motion granted, judgment vacated and new trial granted. Memorandum: Since no appeal was taken by the District Attorney from the order granting defendant's application to be resentenced, we are not empowered to review the propriety of that order, and as a consequence, we are now constrained to grant defendant's motion. The destruction of the trial transcript and stenographic notes forecloses the defendant from having an appellate review of any of the evidence and rulings of the trial court. ( People v. Jackson, 36 A.D.2d 1008; People v. Schwach, 16 A.D.2d 879; People v. Lomoso, 284 App. Div. 670. )
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.