Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

HOLMES v. BROODNO

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 15, 1972
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Appeals — Arbitration — Act of June 16, 1836, P.L. 715, as amended — Payment of record costs directory, not mandatory — Matters de minimis.

HOFFMAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which WATKINS and JACOBS, JJ., joined.

Submitted June 14, 1972.

OPINION BY PACKEL, J., September 15, 1972:

The quashing of the appeal is reversed for reasons stated in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Super. 469, 294 A.2d 898 (1972).

DISSENTING OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J.:

I dissent for the same reasons as set forth in my opinion in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Super. 469, 294 A.2d 898 (1972).

WATKINS and JACOBS, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.