COMMONWEALTH v. MAYBERRY ET AL

Courts — Contempt of court — Trial by jury.

Mr. Justice MANDERINO filed a dissenting opinion.

OPINION PER CURIAM, July 2, 1973:

The judgments of contempt are affirmed.

DISSENTING OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE MANDERINO:

I dissent because the defendants were entitled to a jury trial. See United States v. Seale, 461 F.2d 345 (7th Cir. 1972); Commonwealth v. Patterson, 452 Pa. 457, 308 A.2d 90 (1973) (MANDERINO, J., dissenting).