PEOPLE v. BOETTNER

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We affirm on the opinion at Special Term. We find no authority to support the dicta in People v Haskins ( 48 A.D.2d 480) that would depart from the established rule that neither the Fourth nor Fourteenth Amendments proscribe private as opposed to governmental activity in the area of searches made and statements taken in the course of criminal investigative procedures (see People v Gleeson, 36 N.Y.2d 462; People v Horman, 22 N.Y.2d 378).