Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ZANELLI v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec 12, 1975
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM:

We agree with the decision and order of the Federal Maritime Commission, that appellant, who is licensed as an independent ocean freight forwarder, cannot hold such a license if he acts as shipper, agent for a consignee, seller, financier, or has obtained a beneficial interest in the goods shipped. See 46 U.S.C. ยง 801, 841b; 46 C.F.R. 510.21(1); and prior decisions of the Commission cited in the ALJ's decision. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. FMC, 497 F.2d 1053 (C.A.8, 1974), is not to the contrary, and indeed appellant does not contend that it is. It involved a forwarder's relationship to ITC, an interlocking company that performed services for shippers but acquired no beneficial interest in shipments.

14 Shipping Regulatory Reports, (Pike Fisher) 1256, adopting the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, a resume of which is reported at p. 835 of the same volume.

The decision and order of the Commission are affirmed.