- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
UNITED STATES v. NARISI
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sep 20, 1976
PER CURIAM:
The district court has failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 11(c), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, by not personally informing appellant of the constitutionally protected rights which she would be waiving if her guilty plea was accepted, and by not ascertaining that appellant understood those rights and voluntarily waived them. McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 89 S.Ct. 1166, 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); United States v. Crook, 5 Cir. 1976, 526 F.2d 708; Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).
Mrs. Narisi's conviction is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.