- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SMITH v. UNITED STATES
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec 13, 1976
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs, a Mississippi highway patrolman and wife, sued for a refund of income taxes for 1972. The government included in income cash payments received by the husband to reimburse him for the cost of meals eaten while on duty. Plaintiffs claimed the payments were excludable under ยง 119 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The district court granted a refund, relying on U.S. v. Barrett, 321 F.2d 911 (C.A.5, 1963). The government concedes that Barrett controls unless reversed.
We affirm on the basis of Barrett. Accord, U.S. v. Morelan, 356 F.2d 199 (C.A.8, 1966); Keeton v. U.S., 383 F.2d 429 (C.A. 10, 1967). Contra, Wilson v. U.S., 412 F.2d 694 (C.A.1, 1969).
AFFIRMED.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.