- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
HILL v. COCKRELL
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jan 14, 1977
WEBB, Judge.
"[W]here the trial judge, sitting as the trior of the facts, hears the evidence, his findings based upon conflicting evidence is analogous to the verdict of a jury and should not be disturbed by a reviewing court if there is any evidence to support it." West v. West, 228 Ga. 397, 398 ( 185 S.E.2d 763) (1971); Lester Colodny Const. Co. v. Allen, 129 Ga. App. 545 ( 199 S.E.2d 917) (1973). Here there was ample legal evidence to support the findings of fact, and there is no error in the trial judge's conclusions of law. Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.
For prior appearance see Hill v. Cockrell, 139 Ga. App. 616 ( 229 S.E.2d 105) (1976).
WEBB, Judge.
SUBMITTED JANUARY 7, 1977 — DECIDED JANUARY 14, 1977.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.