IN RE ESTATE OF WALTER BECHTOLD

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Gelman in his written opinion which is reported at 150 N.J. Super. 550 (1977). See also 5 N.J. Practice ( Clapp, Wills and Administration), § 38 at 95-103 (1962), Supplement, § 38 at 42, n. 35 (1977).