Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

HUDSON v. RHODES

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Jul 31, 1978
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

Three male inmates of Ohio prisons and two women engaged to marry inmates filed this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 seeking to enjoin enforcement of an unwritten policy of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections which forbids the marriage of incarcerated persons. District Judge Don J. Young dismissed the action and plaintiffs appeal.

We affirm on authority of Johnson v. Rockefeller, 365 F. Supp. 377 (S.D.N.Y. 1973), aff'd sub nom. (without opinion) Butler v. Wilson, Governor of New York, 415 U.S. 953, 94 S.Ct. 1479, 39 L.Ed.2d 569 (1974); see also Polmaskitch v. United States, 436 F. Supp. 527 (W.D.Okl. 1977).

Affirmed.