STATE v. SCHORLING

Granted. The motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum is overruled, as the records sought are not "internal security information" mentioned in R.S. 44:3, subd. A(3). However, the trial judge shall first delete those records pertaining to pending or reasonably anticipated criminal litigation or records containing or tending to identify a confidential source of information.

SUMMERS, C. J., dissents and would deny the writ.