Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

HERWIG v. ENERSON EGGEN

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Mar 31, 1981
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 79-1474.

Attorney(S)

For the petitioner there were briefs by Ward I. Richter and Bell, Metzner Gierhart, S.C., of Madison and oral argument by Mr. Richter. For plaintiff-appellant there was a brief by James C. Bohl and Quale, Hartmann, Bohl Evenson of Baraboo and oral argument by James C. Bohl. For defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellant there was a brief by Bruce R. Rasmussen and Rasmussen Law Offices of Beaver Dam, and oral argument by Mr. Rasmussen.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed, Justice Callow, Justice Coffey and Justice Steinmetz being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed; Justice Heffernan, Justice Abrahamson and Justice Day being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed; and Chief Justice Beilfuss not having participated in this appeal. The decision is therefore affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x