OWENS v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mr. Owens has raised a question concerning the admissibility of certain impeachment evidence. It has repeatedly been held that relief under rule 3.850 is not available as to any matters which could have been raised by direct appeal. Falagan v. State, 267 So.2d 109 (Fla.2d DCA 1972); Mitchell v. State, 381 So.2d 760 (Fla.5th DCA 1980).

RYDER, Acting C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.