Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

RUDES v. WALRATH

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
May 6, 1982
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. The determination by the Appellate Division which reverses Trial Term's setting aside of a jury verdict as being against the weight of the credible evidence is beyond this court's power of review ( Goehle v Town of Smithtown, 55 N.Y.2d 995; Rochester Tel. Corp. v Green Is. Constr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 788; Gutin v Mascali Sons, 11 N.Y.2d 97, 99; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], ยง 148, p 588). As to the defects in the charge discussed in the dissent at the Appellate Division, no question of law was preserved for review by this court.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.