CLOUTIER v. CLOUTIER

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant wife appeals from so much of an order at Special Term as temporarily determined maintenance, pending divorce proceedings. In affirming, we note that courts have repeatedly held that "`"the remedy for any claimed inequity in awards of temporary alimony, child support or maintenance is a speedy trial where the respective finances of the parties can be ascertained and a permanent award based on the evidence may be made"'" ( Vesper v Vesper, 46 A.D.2d 729; see Woram v Gilliam, 78 A.D.2d 796; Sterlace v Sterlace, 63 A.D.2d 450).