BARTAL v. BARTAL

In a matrimonial action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Walsh, J.), entered May 23, 1983, which denied her motion to, in effect, reargue a prior motion for pendente lite relief. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( Frankel v Frankel, 67 A.D.2d 719). Although plaintiff denominated her motion as one seeking renewal and reargument, no new facts were presented. Titone, J.P., Lazer, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.