- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
EX PARTE INZER
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Mar 2, 1984
EMBRY, Justice.
The conclusions of the Court of Criminal Appeals are not in conflict with those reached in Ingle v. State, 415 So.2d 1225 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); we therefore deny the writ. In doing so, however, we do not intend to endorse the reasoning or dicta included within Inzer v. State, 447 So.2d 838 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982).
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, ALMON and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.