- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Jul 13, 1984
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for burglary, third degree, arising out of an entry into an occupied building. We find no merit to his contention that there was insufficient proof of his intention to commit a crime within the building. Intention to commit a crime may be inferred from proof of circumstances surrounding the entry such as the evidence adduced here that the entry was forced (see, e.g., People v. Barnes, 50 N.Y.2d 375; People v. Mackey, 49 N.Y.2d 274; People v. Terry, 43 A.D.2d 875). Nor do we find any abuse of discretion in the court's denial of defendant's request for an adjournment to retain counsel. We do not find the sentence excessive.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.