- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SMITH v. STARK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jul 30, 1984
¶ Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
¶ Plaintiff has failed to present a genuine issue of fact as to defendant Union Carbide's liability (see Southern Assoc. v. United Brands Co., 67 A.D.2d 199). Plaintiff's testimony at an examination before trial effectively belies his contention that the design of the swimming pool liner manufactured by Union Carbide proximately caused his accident (cf. Sommella v. Roach, 91 A.D.2d 630, affd 59 N.Y.2d 622). Mollen, P.J., Weinstein, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.