LEHMAN v. LEHMAN

This court's modification is intended to clarify that portion of Special Term's order covering arrears to conform with the pendente lite award. Considering the respective income, assets and needs of the parties, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in connection with its award of temporary maintenance and child support. Any alleged inequities in the court's award should be resolved by means of an expeditious trial. ( McKee v McKee, 96 A.D.2d 531; Beckwith v Beckwith, 95 A.D.2d 943; Rossman v Rossman, 91 A.D.2d 1036; Jorgensen v Jorgensen, 86 A.D.2d 861.)

Concur — Sandler, J.P., Ross, Carro, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.