HORNBECK v. HORNBECK

Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A review of the record before Special Term, as well as its findings with respect to the appropriate statutory guidelines, indicates that Special Term's awards did not constitute an abuse of discretion. (Domestic Relations Law, § 236, part B, subd. 5, par g; subd. 6, par b; subd. 7, par b). Titone, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and Brown, JJ., concur.