PEOPLE v. ROYSTER

Resentence affirmed.

Defendant presents no evidence of any broken promises on the part of the District Attorney nor any prosecutorial misconduct during the plea negotiations sufficient to warrant vacatur of his resentence (see People v Eason, 40 N.Y.2d 297; People v David, 102 A.D.2d 551; People v Loebl, 77 A.D.2d 949). Defendant's constitutional claims are without merit (see People v Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, cert. den. 423 U.S. 950). Titone, J.P., Bracken, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.