ZEBALLOS v. ZEBALLOS

Order affirmed, with costs.

Based on the record submitted, the issue concerning plaintiff's allegedly untimely pursuit of a default judgment was not raised in defendant's motion papers to vacate the default and, therefore, may not be considered for the first time on appeal ( Brent-Grand v Megavolt Corp., 97 A.D.2d 783; Arnold v New City Condominiums Corp., 88 A.D.2d 578, 579). Titone, J.P., Lazer, Bracken and Boyers, JJ., concur.