PEOPLE v. RODMAN

Judgment affirmed.

Criminal Term did not err in excluding testimony relevant to the proposed defense of justification in the instant prosecution for criminal possession of a weapon (see People v Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126, 130). We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.