PEOPLE v. FLAMMER

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant admittedly engaged in sexual intercourse with the complainant and the only question at trial was whether the complainant did so under forcible compulsion. The jury resolved the issue against the defendant and we perceive no basis in the evidence for overturning the jury's assessment of credibility.

No error was committed in permitting a knife allegedly possessed by the defendant at the time of the attack to be received as real evidence. Significantly, it was not a common knife. Rather it was high-quality cutlery used in the restaurant business and defendant was the chef at the restaurant in the hotel where the incident took place. Moreover, the knife was found within hours of the attack in a location where it was conceivable that defendant might have disposed of it. These facts established a sufficient nexus between the knife and the defendant ( People v. Mirenda, 23 N.Y.2d 439, 453; People v Simmons, 99 A.D.2d 880, 881; People v. Dasch, 79 A.D.2d 877, 878; People v. Blanchard, 55 A.D.2d 968, 969; People v. Randolph, 40 A.D.2d 806). Mollen, P.J., Titone, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.