PEOPLE v. MARLETTI

Judgment affirmed.

The stop of the automobile defendant was driving, along with the seizure of the gun which was in open view, was reasonable and proper ( People v. Singleton, 50 A.D.2d 939, affd 41 N.Y.2d 402). Moreover, the statements defendant made were in response to legitimate, on-the-scene questioning and were not the product of custodial interrogation and thus were properly admitted into evidence ( Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 477-478). Defendant's other contentions are either unpreserved or without merit. Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.