PEOPLE v. REISING

Sentence affirmed.

Whether a continuance should be granted rests in the discretion of the Trial Judge (e.g., People v. Cable, 63 N.Y.2d 270) and on this record, we cannot say that it was an improvident exercise of discretion to refuse to adjourn sentencing for two weeks (see People v. Sprow, 104 A.D.2d 1056; People v. Matta, 103 A.D.2d 756). The sentence imposed was in accordance with the bargained plea and appellate modification is not warranted (cf. People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Titone, J.P., Weinstein, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.