- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ROTHERMEL
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 31, 1984
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Attorneys at law — Misconduct — One-year suspension — Conversion of trust account funds — Failure to maintain identity of clients' funds.
Per Curiam.
Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objections to the board's recommendations, we agree that the appropriate sanction for respondent is a one-year suspension.
Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.
Judgment accordingly.
CELEBREZZE, C.J., W. BROWN, SWEENEY, LOCHER, HOLMES, C. BROWN and J.P. CELEBREZZE, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.