Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ROTHERMEL

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 31, 1984
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — One-year suspension — Conversion of trust account funds — Failure to maintain identity of clients' funds.

Per Curiam.

Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objections to the board's recommendations, we agree that the appropriate sanction for respondent is a one-year suspension.

Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

CELEBREZZE, C.J., W. BROWN, SWEENEY, LOCHER, HOLMES, C. BROWN and J.P. CELEBREZZE, JJ., concur.