- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SHAW
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 31, 1984
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Indefinite suspension — Misappropriation of funds.
Per Curiam.
After a careful review of the evidence, this court finds that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6), DR 7-101(A)(3), and DR 9-102(A) and (B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Accordingly, we concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners.
Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
CELEBREZZE, C.J., W. BROWN, SWEENEY, LOCHER, HOLMES, C. BROWN and J.P. CELEBREZZE, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.