- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BROMBERG v. MORTON V. ELLISH, INC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jan 28, 1985
Order affirmed, with costs.
Upon a review of the record, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants' motion (CPLR 6514, subd [c]) for costs and expenses occasioned by the filing by plaintiffs, and subsequent cancellation by the court, of a notice of pendency. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.